CHAPTER

6

The French Revolutionary War
and the expansion of
the First Rate

image

WILLIAM Anderson’s oil painting of the Spithead review of the fleet mobilised against Spain over the Nootka Sound crisis in 1790. In the centre of a veritable squadron of three-deckers is Lord Howe’s flagship, the newly commissioned Queen Charlotte, with her distinctive and highly painted figurehead.
[NMM BHC2260]

image

THE design draught for the Royal George class (it was also used for the Queen Charlotte of 1790). Later amendments include a solid barricade for the poop, associated with the installation of carronades on that deck.
[NMM J1722]

image

A contemporary ‘Dockyard’ model of the Queen Charlotte, with particularly fine decorative carving, including the ship’s unusual figurehead. From the middle of the eighteenth century, the open-frame convention was generally abandoned in favour of a solid or planked lower hull, even in official models.
[NMM B9563]

The arrival of peace in 1782 saw the beginnings of a policy of augmenting the larger ships of the Royal Navy. In spite of Rodney’s victory at the Saintes, the American Revolutionary War had witnessed for the first time in a century a successful challenge to British naval dominance, and the French navy had given a good account of itself, which led many in Britain to eye with respect the larger and well-designed capital ships of their main challenger. The Admiralty, of which Keppel became First Lord after the fall of Lord North’s administration removed Sandwich from office, rapidly began the construction of new three-deckers. Two new First Rates were ordered in 1782 and two Second Rates in the following year. Both designs were prepared by Edward Hunt, the former Master Shipwright at Portsmouth who had become Surveyor of the Navy in March 1778.

The first of the new ships was actually ordered in the dying days of Sandwich’s Board after Lord North’s resignation; initially named Umpire, she was renamed Royal George on 11 September 1782 following the former Royal George’s tragic loss a fortnight earlier. After launch, she remained incomplete at Chatham for nineteen months before being taken to Plymouth, where she was fitted for Channel service, completing in July 1790 at a total cost (building plus fitting) of £68,392.6.0d.

The new Royal George was first commissioned in May 1790 under Captain Thomas Pringle. She recommissioned in February 1793, following the outbreak of war, under Captain William Dommett, as Alexander Hood’s flagship with Howe’s fleet. She took part in the Battle of the Glorious First of June (1794) with this flag. On 1795 she hoisted the flag of Lord Bridport, and took part in the action named after the admiral off Île Groix on 23 June 1795. Paid off into Ordinary in April 1802, she underwent a Middling Repair and refit at Plymouth between July 1805 and July 1806. She was recommissioned in June 1806 under Captain Charles Gill, for Channel service. In January 1807 she became the flagship of John Duckworth off Cadiz, with Captain Richard Dunn as her new commander. She was finally laid up at Plymouth in July 1814, and taken to pieces there in February 1822.

image

THE replacement Queen Charlotte of 1810 depicted during the Bombardment of Algiers in 1816 – probably the last time a British First Rate took part in a general action under sail. Here she was the flagship of the expeditionary force commanded by Admiral Edward Pellew, who was created Viscount Exmouth following this action against the depredations of the Algerine pirates. His squadron also included the Second Rate Impregnable, three 74s (Superb, Minden and Albion), the 50-gun Leander and four modern frigates (Severn, Glasgow, Granicus and Hebrus), together with assorted minor vessels and a Dutch squadron which assisted in the action.
[NMM PW4866]

The Royal George Class (Hunt design) – construction history

image

The Royal George Class mounted thirty 42-pounders (lower deck), twenty-eight 24-pounders (middle deck), thirty 18-pounders (upper deck) and twelve 12-pounders (ten on the quarterdeck, 2 on the forecastle). However the Royal George had 12-pounders on the upper deck.

The Royal George Class (Hunt design) – dimensions in feet and inches

image

The second ship was approved to be built to the same draught on 12 December 1782 and was named Queen Charlotte on 21 January 1783. She completed fitting on 7 June 1790, equipped for a flag officer, at a total cost (building plus fitting) of £66,112.3.8d. Commissioned in May 1790 under Captain Roger Curtis, she flew the flag of Rear-Admiral John Leveson Gower, and also served as the flagship of Admiral Lord Howe for the ‘Spanish Armament’ – the emergency mobilisation of 1790 in response to the Nootka Sound crisis – before paying off later in the year.

The Queen Charlotte was recommissioned in February 1793 by Captain Curtis (who was knighted later that year), still flying Lord Howe’s flag; in this role, she took part in the Glorious First of June battle in 1794. She was recommissioned in June 1799 under Captain Andrew Todd, and served as the flagship of Lord Keith’s Mediterranean Fleet. Sadly, she was lost in this role (while Keith was ashore) near Leghorn through an accidental fire.

VILLE DE PARIS

image

A third 100-gun ship to the draught of the Royal George was ordered in May 1788, but the new Surveyor of the Navy, John Henslow, prepared and submitted an amended draught for this vessel. With the decision being taken to substitute 32-pounder guns for the 42-pounders on the lower deck, Henslow was able to fit an extra pair of 24-pounder guns and gunports into the middle deck, and an extra pair of 18-pounder guns and gunports into the upper deck, at the expense of barely 8 inches of length being added to this ship. More easily, an additional pair of 12-pounders could be added on the forecastle, and two extra pairs on the quarterdeck, so turning the design into a 110-gun ship. The new design was approved on 5 August. On 26 September the ship was given the name of Ville de Paris to commemorate the prize taken in 1782. Ironically, Britain’s largest warship to be built in the eighteenth century would thus honour the French capital.

image

THOMAS Buttersworth’s oil painting shows the Ville de Paris under full sail about 1801, flying the flag of Admiral William Cornwallis, then commander of the Channel Fleet. The ship has quarter davits, which were a very recent innovation.
[NMM BHC2271]

image

WHEN it was decided to increase the rating of the Ville de Paris from 100 to 110 guns, this was achieved by little more than a rearrangement of the ports and the addition of small guns on the upperworks, but for the next ship the design was ‘stretched’ to allow an extra port on each gundeck and hence a more rational disposition of firepower. This was achieved by the apparently crude measure of inserting a set of frames amidships – symbolised by physically cutting the framing draught and splicing in a new (and lighter) piece of paper with the additional timbers drawn on. The inspiration for this move was a desire to improve the speed of British warships (waterline length being the single largest element affecting speed), and a development that affected every rate from frigates to three-deckers in the 1790s, as the war at sea turned increasingly into the pursuit of a reluctant enemy.
[NMM J1815]

image

ORIGINALLY intended to be a third ship of the Royal George class, Ville de Paris was built to a new 110-gun design, as shown in this draught. It is dated 1788, but is also overlaid with the outline of the later radical alterations to give the ship a round stern and bow.
[NMM J1944]

Construction was entrusted to Nicholas Phillips, the Master Shipwright at Chatham, although the holder of this post would change three times during the construction period. The Ville de Paris completed fitting out at Chatham on 17 September 1796 (having cost £78,830 up to that time), and was commissioned the following month under Captain Walter Lock. She was to serve right throughout the war period for the next eighteen years, chiefly as a flagship in either Home waters or in the Mediterranean, but never taking part in any of the major fleet actions of that time.

HIBERNIA

image

In December 1790 a further ship was ordered to the Henslow draught of the Ville de Paris, to carry 110 guns. She was begun in 1792 at Plymouth, under the direction of Master Shipwright Thomas Pollard, although like the Ville de Paris there were to be three changes in the post-holder before the ship was launched. In 1795 the Admiralty was becoming concerned about the speed of French warships, and had concluded that the best way to raise the speed of British equivalents was to increase their length. This principle was applied to both frigates and line of battle ships, including First Rates, and for the new ship the revised design added a mid-section of 11ft 2 in to the previous design – the frames on the stocks at Plymouth had to be physically pulled apart so that this midsection could be inserted. As a consequence an additional pair of gunports and guns could be fitted into each of the three complete decks.

The ordnance on the quarterdeck and forecastle could also be augmented, with 18-pounder long guns replacing the 12-pounders of her predecessors, although the proportion of carronades on these decks was also increased – the ship had eight pairs of gunports on the quarterdeck, and carried four 18-pounders and a dozen 32-pounders carronades here; she had three pairs of gunports on the forecastle, with two 18-pounders and four 32-pounder carronades established. Since six of these carronades were deemed to be carried instead of the long guns that would have been carried before, that number were now included in the ship’s established gun rating, which was thus stated as 110 guns. As before, the six 24-pounder carronades carried on the roundhouse roof were not included in the total.

The reconstruction while on the stocks inevitably delayed the ship’s completion, and the Hibernia was not launched until November 1804, having cost £71,139 to build. She was commissioned that month under Captain Edward Thornbrough, and completed fitting out on 7 March 1805, at the cost of a further £17,661, Admiral Lord (Alan) Gardner raised his flag aboard, as the C-in-C of the Channel Fleet from 3 April Like the Ville de Paris, the Hibernia was to serve throughout the next ten years as a flagship on various stations, before being paid off into Ordinary at Portsmouth in October 1815.

The Growth in Designs 1788 to 1798 – construction history

image

The Growth in Designs 1788 to 1798 – dimensions in feet and inches

image
image

A further 100-gun ship was ordered in 1794 to Sir William Rule’s design, and Caledonia was laid down on the first day of 1805 on the slipway recently vacated by the Hibernia. Earlier it had been decided to make her carry 120 guns, and the Surveyor amended his design to this effect. This draught shows the ship as completed, and is notable for the first appearance of the built-up or ‘round’ bow in a First Rate; even the traditional flat stern is more upright, and she has solid barricades along the upperworks. She was altered in the late 1820s, when she was widened, given a circular stern, and acquired a more uniform ordnance of 32-pounder guns on all three decks. Initially 63cwt guns were supplied for the lower deck, but this weight made her lower gunports too close to the waterline, and in 1831 the Admiralty instructed them to be replaced by ones of 55cwt. At the same time her galley was moved up to the upper deck, and her sick berth moved up to the middle deck.
[NMM J1952]

CALEDONIA

image

In November 1794 a new First Rate was ordered for the Royal Navy. Although it was at first intended that she should be a 100-gun ship, Rule’s design was eventually altered to make her a 120-gun ship, the largest warship yet built for the British, measuring over 2600 tons. Later alterations saw nearly a foot added to her planned breadth, raising her size to over 2700 tons. With the urgent need for smaller battlefleet ships, which could be built quicker, she was not laid down until 1805, and was finally launched in June 1808. The Caledonia, as she was named, was an immediate success, widely regarded as the finest First Rate so far built. Most subsequent First Rates followed her design, and its essentials were to be maintained for almost the whole of the remaining sailing era.

Having looked at the way in which the basic concept of the First Rate (and its ordnance) was expanded over the last decade of the eighteenth century, we now need to retrace our steps a little to the start of that decade, and look at other events during that period, particularly the consequences of the fresh war which broke out in 1793. In early 1790 there were five First Rates, each of 100 guns, including the Queen Charlotte, lying finished on the stocks but not yet launched. Each had a complement of 850, which was reduced to 837 from 16 April 1794; eight carronades were added to the Establishment from 19 November 1794 – two 32-pounders (on the forecastle) and six 24-pounders (on the roundhouse). Under construction was a larger three-decker of 112 guns (still with 837 men), while even larger First Rates of 120 guns (and 865 men) were to be built by 1815. The remaining 42-pounders on some vessels’ gundecks began to be replaced by 32-pounders from 1790, although the process continued beyond the turn of the century.

The nominal strength of the Royal Navy was increased by three First Rates captured from the enemy during this time: the Commerce de Marseille, a French 120-gun ship brought away from Toulon in 1793; and two Spanish 112-gun ships captured off Cape St Vincent on 14 February 1797, the Salvador del Mundo and the San Josef (retaining their names). Only the last proved of any real value as a fighting unit, but the Salvador del Mundo was commissioned for a short period of sea service (see Chapter 11 for details).

On the other side of the balance sheet, the Royal Navy suffered its most grievous loss of the French Revolutionary War on 17 March 1800 when the Queen Charlotte, Lord Keith’s flagship in the Mediterranean, caught fire by accident and eventually blew up off Leghorn. The fire started aft around 6am and burnt for several hours before it became obvious that she was unsaveable. Major efforts by her consorts to save men as they abandoned ship were hampered by the fear of explosion, and some 690 were lost, including her commander, Captain Andrew Todd (Admiral Keith was ashore at the time).

A replacement to the same Hunt design (and repeating the same name) was ordered by Earl Saint Vincent’s incoming Board in July 1801, although the keel for the new ship was not laid down until October 1805 since priority was being given to ships which could be brought into service quickly. She differed little from her predecessor, except to mount a more extensive carronade establishment – fourteen 32-pounder carronades disposed two to the forecastle and twelve on the quarterdeck (reducing the long 12-pounder guns to a single pair of chase guns in each location), and six 18-pounder carronades on the roundhouse deck.

Although not launched until May 1810, the second Queen Charlotte was to have a long career. Following the Napoleonic War, she was re-rated as a 108-gun ship from February 1817. Eventually she was renamed Excellent (on 31 December 1859) as a gunnery training hulk, and was not sold to be broken up until January 1892.

THE SURVEYORS’ JOINT DESIGNS

image

Before the qualities of the new Caledonia could be tested, however, the Admiralty was faced with the issue of how the future of its ships of the line was to develop. An order for a fresh First Rate of 120 guns was placed in November 1805, immediately following the news of the victory at Cape Trafalgar; two more First Rates were ordered in January 1806. The question then to be considered was how to develop an appropriate design for these three, as well as for smaller ships of the line. Following what had become a common practice since the introduction of joint Surveyors, the Admiralty instructed each of the two Surveyors in August 1806 to prepare new designs for First, Second and Third Rates. The individual plans for Third Rates were produced first, but the Admiralty saw merits in both proposed draughts and instructed the Surveyors to work together on a common design, at which point the Surveyors suggested that they should similarly collaborate on common plans for First and Second Rates.

The Nelson Class (Surveyors’ joint design) – construction history

image

The Nelson Class (Surveyors’ joint design) – dimensions in feet and inches

image

image

THIS small-scale pictorial plan of the Nelson is one of a series by the artist James Pringle showing typical vessels of the post-Napoleonic Royal Navy. Depicting both the exterior and interior, it reveals more detail than the standard Admiralty draught, including the lower masts. The Surveyors’ design produced a workaday ship, but like many products of a committee it was not outstanding.
[NMM J8589]

image

THIS illustration of the Nelson under construction at Woolwich can be dated to early 1814, as the ship is virtually ready for launching. Early First Rates tended to be built in dry-dock and floated out when completed, but by this time shipwrights had sufficient confidence, born of experience, to launch even the largest ships from a slipway. The configuration of the bow is not clear, but it looks like the artist is trying to depict the new round bow, as opposed to a flat beakhead bulkhead as shown on the building draught. Temporary light masts are in place to carry flags and banners during the launching ceremony; these will be removed afterwards and the heavy lower masts will be stepped in their place with the assistance of Woolwich’s sheer hulk, the former 50-gun Preston.
[NMM PU6093]

The Surveyors’ joint plan for a 74-gun Third Rate was to produce the numerous ships of the Armada (or ‘Surveyors of the Navy’) Class, often referred to as the ‘Forty Thieves’ because of the unexpected costs and problems associated with their building. The Surveyors also developed a common design for a 120-gun First Rate, of which the first ship was to be named after the new British ‘God of War’, the recently killed Horatio Nelson. And finally they came up with a 98-gun Second Rate, to which design a single ship was ordered in June 1807, named the Trafalgar after the hero’s greatest victory.

Various other improvements were made around this time. Like the Caledonia, the Nelson class had a built-up ‘round’ bow without a beakhead bulkhead, which gave more structural strength forward, as well as providing more space for the guns on the upper deck and forecastle. Aft, the square stern was retained, with the traditional quarter galleries, but without the protruding sternwalks. The barricades along both quarterdeck and forecastle were now ‘berthed up’ (solid), to give added protection to the gun crews on these decks. But like all compromises, the joint designs were not outstanding. Whereas the new Caledonia when she appeared was generally described as ‘flawless’, unfortunately the Nelson and her two sisters were found to be less meritorious. It was decided that any future orders for 120-gun ships should follow the Caledonia draught, and no further units to the Surveyor’s draught for the Nelson were to be ordered.

The single Second Rate under this programme – the Trafalgar – was ordered in 1807 from Chatham Dockyard, but not laid down until 1813 and launched in 1820, after being re-classed as a First Rate of 106 guns in 1817. Renamed Camperdown in February 1825, she does not feature in this volume.

image

HIBERNLA enjoyed a long career and is depicted here by the seaman artist Lieutenant Humphrey J Julian, who was the ship’s first lieutenant during her 1845 commission as flagship of the Mediterranean Fleet. The ship shows the circular stern fitted during her reconstruction of 1819–1825. She was to survive in various reduced capacities until broken up in 1902.
[NMM PW5999]

The initial armament for these three ships was established as sixteen pairs of 32-pounders on the lower deck, seventeen pairs of 24-pounders on the middle deck, and seventeen pairs of 18-pounders on the upper deck. To make up the total of 120 guns, each had six 12-pounders and ten 32-pounder carronades on the quarterdeck, and another two 12-pounders and two 32-pounder carronades on the forecastle. There were additionally (and uncounted in the established total) six 18-pounder carronades on the roundhouse. The Saint Vincent and Howe were subsequently refitted with short 32-pounders of reduced weights replacing the 24-pounders and 18-pounders on the middle and upper decks (but with a pair of 68-pounder carronades supplanting one pair of long guns on each of the three full decks); the six 12-pounders and six of the carronades on the quarterdeck were replaced by twelve 18-pounders, and another pair of 18-pounders replaced the 12-pounders on the forecastle.

Nelson

All three ships were completed to the launching stage by the early summer of 1814. Although launched first (at a cost of £123,469), the Nelson saw no active service at all. Six weeks after her launch, on 17 August 1814 she was sailed round from Woolwich to Portsmouth under the command of under Captain Thomas Burton to complete her fitting out, but she was then promptly laid up and housed over fore and aft, and her hull doubled for protection. She underwent a Very Large Repair at Portsmouth between October 1825 and September 1828 (at a cost of £86,512), the doubling was removed in September 1837, and she was converted to an Advanced Ship (this concept is explained in the following chapter) between April and June 1846 (at the cost of a further £15,267), but at no time was she brought into service. She remained at Portsmouth until 1858, when she became the oldest 120-gun ship to be converted to steam, and the only ship launched before the end of the Napoleonic era to be so converted. On 5 February 1859 it was instructed that she was to be cut down a deck at Portsmouth into a 90-gun Second Rate, with a 500nhp Ravenhill horizontal trunk engine and screw fitted.

The Nelson was taken in hand on 10 March, and the rebuilding work was completed on 7 February 1860. The new engine was fitted in September 1860, and the ship joined the Second Division of the Steam Reserve, still uncommissioned. In February she was transferred to the Government of the (Australian) colony of Victoria, to be used as a training ship, and she continued in that role for some thirty years. The Nelson was then sold as a stores hulk on 28 April 1898, being finally taken to pieces at Launceston in September 1928.

image

A  watercolour by William Joy of the Saint Vincent as she appeared in later life. She was reduced to 102 guns in 1850 and served as a troopship during the Russian War, to which period this image can be dated.
[NMM PAF6090]

Saint Vincent

Both her sister-ships were to predecease the Nelson, neither being considered suitable for conversion to steam. The Saint Vincent was ready for launch at Plymouth by June 1814, but was left on the slip to allow her timber to season until March 1815. Built at a cost of £110,549, she was put into Ordinary straight away and remained there, apart from a Very Small Repair carried out (at a cost of £14,256) between June and October 1823, until 1829. She was then fitted as a Guard Ship (for £25,818) between September 1829 and May 1830, while under the command of Captain Edward Hawker as the flagship of Lord Northesk. On completion of this work, she was moved to Portsmouth, to become Hyde Parker’s flagship. Humphrey Senhouse took over as captain on 25 February 1831, and the Saint Vincent became the flagship of the Mediterranean Fleet for the next three years (stationed at Lisbon from end 1832 until 1833). She was paid off in March 1834 at Portsmouth, and began a refit between May and July 1834 (at the cost of £3252) for a fresh commission, but this refit was then cancelled and the ship remained laid up. The Saint Vincent was taken in hand in July 1839 for a Small Repair and was then fitted as a Demonstration Ship and a flagship for £41,016), the work continuing until August 1843. She was brought back into commission on 1 October 1841, becoming the flagship of Sir Edward Codrington at Portsmouth. She stayed in that role until the end of 1848, paying off in June 1849.

Between April 1849 and December 1851 the Saint Vincent underwent another Very Small Repair and was fitted as an Advanced Ship (for £17,528). She remained in Ordinary until November 1853, when she recommissioned as the flagship of Rear-Admiral William Fanshawe Martin, and was fitted as a Guard Ship in March/April 1854 (at the cost of £8576). Under Martin’s flag, she remained a flagship until 1856, briefly deploying to the Baltic Sea (transporting French troops thither) during the Russian War. In February 1858 she was Rear-Admiral George Grey’s flagship at Portsmouth, serving also as a depot ship for Reserves. At the start of 1862 the Saint Vincent became a training ship for boy entrants, an activity that was to last until the following century. She was finally sold to the shipbreaking firm of Castle on the Thames on 17 May 1906.

Howe

Like the Saint Vincent, the Howe was completed at Chatham by May 1814 but was left on the slip to season until the following March. Built at a cost of £98,105, she was sailed round to Sheerness on 24 May 1815 and left in Ordinary. She remained there for twenty years, although some defects were made good there between September 1823 and April 1824 (at a cost of £10,520) and partial repairs took place at Chatham between October 1832 and July 1833 (a cost of £5142). The Howe was then fitted out as a flagship between July 1835 and July 1836 (for £10,109) and commissioned on 27 August 1835 under Captain Alexander Ellice, as the flagship of Sir Robert Otway. She was based at the Nore for the next five years, paying off about September 1840. She underwent another refit at Sheerness between August and October 1840 (for £5603), and recommissioned on 1 October as the flagship of Sir Watkin Pell, departing to take station in the Mediterranean for a three-year stint. Coming home to Sheerness in July 1843, she paid off and was converted to an Advanced Ship between October and January 1844 (at a cost of £4749).

image

MANY of the later First Rates were to spend most of their lives out of commission, but forming a very credible strategic deterrent. For this deterrent to be effective, the ships had to be kept serviceable, and to this end considerable effort, ingenuity and resources were committed. This drawing of the Howe by Henry Moses shows her laid up in Ordinary in the Medway, roofed over forwards and aft to protect her from the weather and with just her lower masts in place. Ships so treated could be kept in good condition and, when required, fitted for service in little more time than it took to raise the crews.
[NMM PU7924]

image

THE sheer draught of the Howe drawn around 1811. The ship displays the squared-off solid barricades of the carronade age and a rather upright stern, but just predated the radical innovations Seppings was about to introduce. The design was more ‘wall-sided’ than the Caledonia, as tumblehome is much reduced, and the sheer was also slightly flattened, with the intention of raising gunport freeboard amidships.
[NMM J1900]

The Howe emerged in 1843, being fitted for sea again between March and May (for £16,044), commissioning under Sir James Stirling on 28 April 1847 and proceeding to Portsmouth. Here she was requisitioned in September of the same year for ‘particular service’, being fitted in October to convey the Queen Dowager to Madeira (a cost of £5042). From there she proceeded to the Mediterranean, where she remained from June 1848 until July 1850. Returning to Sheerness, she passed into Ordinary until she completed being taken to pieces there on 23 February 1854.

The Surveyor’s class was not the largest design of First Rate contemplated by the Admiralty. At the battles of Saint Vincent and Trafalgar, the British Navy had faced Spain’s most famous sailing warship, the Santissima Trinidad, which started life as a 112-gun three-decker, designed and built at Havana in 1769 by Mateo Mullán (the Irish-born shipwright Matthew Mullan), with the same armament as subsequent ships of that rating. During the mid-1790s she had been taken in hand (possibly a proper rebuilding) with barricades being built along the gangways which joined quarterdeck to forecastle; with gunports cut into these barricades, and the space between them fitted with a complete structural deck to bear additional 8-pounders (to make a complete battery of thirty-two weapons of this calibre on what now amounted to a complete fourth gundeck. Four smaller guns were added to the roundhouse deck to give her a complete establishment of 130 guns. She was thus technically a flush four-decker, the only ship of that kind ever completed.

Despite her proven deficiencies, the sheer firepower of Spain’s mammoth 130-gun ship was not lost on the British, and various plans evolved to produce an equivalent. None was to materialise, but a notable candidate was the design prepared by Plymouth’s Master Shipwright Joseph Tucker in 1809 for a four-decker which was provisionally named the Duke of Kent. This monster was never ordered because it was felt that the cost of running her would not justify the tactical gain she could provide; but she would have carried 170 guns on a hull which measured 221 feet along the gundeck and 62 feet 5 inches in breadth.

With the latest First Rates increasing in firepower, the older concept of the First Rate with ‘only’ 100 guns seemed weak in comparison. Even Second Rates began to approach that threshhold, as in 1801 two three-deckers (the Boyne and Union) had been ordered to the exact hull form of the Victory. Even larger three-deckers to designs by Sir William Rule were also built (the Impregnable and Trafalgar). An enlarged version of the Victory design was even produced, to which two ships would be ordered in 1812 (Princess Charlotte and Royal Adelaide). However all six ships were carefully classed as 98-gun, and thus remained within the Second Rate category, although in the reorganisation of the Rates which took place in February 1817 all serviceable three-deckers (including some surviving older 98-gun ships) would end up being re-graded as First Rates.

The Changing Shape of the Stern

image

During the first half of the seventeenth century, English shipwrightry adopted the ‘round tuck’ stern in place of the old flat transom stern that had been the norm for the galleon era. With the ‘square tuck’, the after part of the hull terminated in a transverse panel, which had allowed stern-chase guns to be mounted close to the waterline, so providing better low-level defence especially against galleys. The new round tuck stern was formed by curved planking rounding in to the sternpost at the waterline, allowing a smoother flow of water to the rudder, which improved handling. Another consequence was that the rudder-head could now be taken up through the counter, with a canvas jacket (or rudder-coat) over it to keep out water in rough weather, and was thus inside the ship instead of outside so that the tiller was entirely inboard and less vulnerable in battle. It was to be a distinguishing feature of English warships for the rest of the century, as most other navies retained the flat tuck. The Prince Royal and Sovereign of the Seas were originally built with the old type of flat tuck, but from 1650 onwards new ships all incorporated the round tuck, and the two ships named were modified with round tucks when rebuilt in this period. The drawing of the rebuilt Sovereign as around 1660 1 shows that ports could still be mounted in a round tuck stern, while the Kriegstein model of the Royal James of 1671 2 reveals how the round shape was framed; in this case the gunports are in the flat of the transom, above the tuck proper.

During the eighteenth century there was a noticeable increase in the breadth of the stern, and in the complexity of its framing. Open galleries at the stern had been introduced in the 1670s, and initially took the form of jutting balconies in imitation of French models, but later the open area was often kept within the depth of the gallery or with minimal projection, as seen in the Annapolis model of the 1719 Royal William 3. These galleries were at the levels of the upper deck and quarterdeck, but not on the middle deck, although there was a row of lights (windows) at this level, and occasionally also a fourth tier on the poop. The Victory of 1737, shown in this model painting 4, was unique in having not only four rows of lights but three galleries as well. Originally these stern galleries continued around to the ship’s quarters but during the first quarter of the eighteenth century the quarter galleries were shut off from the stern gallery by a door. Above the transom, the structure of the stern was very light, partly to save weight, but largely because it was difficult to combine strength with the expectations of senior officers regarding their living standards.

The worst excesses of height, however, were curbed by the mid-century and when the next Victory was designed in 1758 there was no structure above the poop 5 However, although popular with flag officers, open galleries made the ship vulnerable to bad weather and a following sea, and the battle-hardened officers of the Nelson era accepted the superiority of closed sterns – the model 6 of Victory’s stern after her Large Repair of 1800–1803 demonstrates the new appearance.

image

1 NMM PZ7257

image

2 KRIEGSTEIN COLLECTION

image

3 US NAVAL ACADEMY MUSEUM, ANNAPOLIS

image

4 KRIEGSTEIN COLLECTION

image

5 NMM F5808-3

image

6 NMM F2881-2

The closed stern did at least allow more guns to be directed aft, and this 1811 draught for the Saint Vincent 7 demonstrates how twelve chase pieces could be contrived at five levels by cutting gunport sills into the frames of two or three lights of each tier of stern lights, plus those in the counter and firing over the taffrail. However, the dashed lines of the stern frames underline how feeble the glass and cabinetwork of the stern was in comparison with the thick oak broadside of the ship, which made the tactic of raking from astern so devastating in battle – a ship crossing the stern could fire a rolling broadside down the length of the target vessel, a ploy used so successfully at Trafalgar that it must have provoked some ‘blue sky thinking’.

The solution – like so many of the structural advances of the last generation of wooden warships – was the brainchild of the Surveyor, Sir Robert Seppings, who introduced a new form he called the circular stern. More substantial framing was carried round the after end of the ship, and with some of the lights doubling as gunports, it allowed an all-round field of fire, including the previously ‘dead arcs’ on the quarters. The open galleries of light ironwork were now entirely outside the ship’s main structure, and were accessed through doors in the stern which also served as gunports in action. To demonstrate its advantages (and those of his diagonal bracing system), Seppings commissioned a model 8 that was divided down the centreline, showing the traditional form in the starboard half and his innovations to port. The advantage was not only that the ship became structurally stronger, but that this also enabled the guns towards the stern ‘to be run out so far as to prevent accidents to the stern by their explosion’. The Navy Board made the new design mandatory from June 1817.

Practical as it was, the stern was ugly to a traditionalist eye, and various shipwrights worked on schemes to combine the strength of Seppings’ concept with a more conventional appearance. The model 9 demonstrates the 1819 proposal of the Master Shipwright at Plymouth, Thomas Roberts, that was adopted as the so-called ‘elliptical stern’; note the unglazed lights, each of which formed a gunport. With minor variations, this was the preferred style of stern for the rest of the sailing era. It pleased the navy’s conservatives because it could be decorated in a familiar style 10 while retaining all-round arcs of fire 11 – sections of the quarter galleries (shown in dashed lines, marked a and b) were removable to form gunports in action; and if flag officers demanded balconies, the light iron structures pioneered by Seppings could be added outboard of the stern structure (Queen draught on page 105).

image

7 NMM J7866

image

8 NMM D4069-7

image

9 NMM L2299

image

10 NMM J1725

image

11 NMM J1728